= In a recent California case, Goonewardene v. ADP, LLC, the plaintiff brought a lawsuit against ADP, a payroll service provider, for wrongful termination, violations of state and federal labor laws, breach of contract, false advertisement, negligence, and negligent misrepresentation. Plaintiff’s former employer had contracted with ADP to provide wage processing services, and under this …
Tag Archives: #Appeal
Social Media Blurbs Regarding Senate Bill 1343
SenateBill1343 expands the requirements for #sexualharassment training, beginning #January2019. #California #TheMoreYouKnow #NewLaw #EskridgeLaw Current #Californialaw requires #employers with #50 or more #employees to provide three hours of #sexualharassment #training to #supervisors. #SenateBill1343 expands this to include employers with at least 5 employees. #EskridgeLaw Beginning #January2020, #SenateBill1343 requires at least one hour of #training on #sexualharassment …
Continue reading “Social Media Blurbs Regarding Senate Bill 1343”
Rodriquez v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.
New U.S. District Court case Rodriquez v. Nike Retail Services, Inc. holds that the #federal de minimis doctrine does not apply to #wage and hour claims under the #California Labor Code because the California #LaborCode requires #employers to pay #employees for all time worked. #EskridgeLaw
New U.S. District Court case basis its holding on Troester v. #Starbucks, where the #court stated that the #employer is precluded from raising a #federal de minimis #defense under #California #law. #EskridgeLaw
Eskridge Law 