In a recent California case, Ward v. Tilly’s, Inc., the plaintiff filed a wage and hour class action against her former employer, Tilly’s, for violating wage order No. 7. The complaint stated that Tilly’s scheduled its employees for regular and on-call shifts. For the shifts that were on-call, employees had to call in two hours …
Tag Archives: #CaliforniaLaborCode
Social Media Blurbs Regarding Senate Bill 1343
SenateBill1343 expands the requirements for #sexualharassment training, beginning #January2019. #California #TheMoreYouKnow #NewLaw #EskridgeLaw Current #Californialaw requires #employers with #50 or more #employees to provide three hours of #sexualharassment #training to #supervisors. #SenateBill1343 expands this to include employers with at least 5 employees. #EskridgeLaw Beginning #January2020, #SenateBill1343 requires at least one hour of #training on #sexualharassment …
Continue reading “Social Media Blurbs Regarding Senate Bill 1343”
Rodriquez v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.
New U.S. District Court case Rodriquez v. Nike Retail Services, Inc. holds that the #federal de minimis doctrine does not apply to #wage and hour claims under the #California Labor Code because the California #LaborCode requires #employers to pay #employees for all time worked. #EskridgeLaw
New U.S. District Court case basis its holding on Troester v. #Starbucks, where the #court stated that the #employer is precluded from raising a #federal de minimis #defense under #California #law. #EskridgeLaw
Eskridge Law 