Tag Archives: #Court

Social Media Blurbs Regarding Senate Bill 1343

SenateBill1343 expands the requirements for #sexualharassment training, beginning #January2019. #California #TheMoreYouKnow #NewLaw #EskridgeLaw Current #Californialaw requires #employers with #50 or more #employees to provide three hours of #sexualharassment #training to #supervisors. #SenateBill1343 expands this to include employers with at least 5 employees. #EskridgeLaw Beginning #January2020, #SenateBill1343 requires at least one hour of #training on #sexualharassment …

Continue reading “Social Media Blurbs Regarding Senate Bill 1343”

Rodriquez v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.

New U.S. District Court case Rodriquez v. Nike Retail Services, Inc. holds that the #federal de minimis doctrine does not apply to #wage and hour claims under the #California Labor Code because the California #LaborCode requires #employers to pay #employees for all time worked. #EskridgeLaw

New U.S. District Court case basis its holding on Troester v. #Starbucks, where the #court stated that the #employer is precluded from raising a #federal de minimis #defense under #California #law. #EskridgeLaw

Ross v. County of Riverside

New CA case Ross v. County of Riverside holds that an employer violates Labor Code section 1102.5 when an employee who revealed information he believed disclosed a violation of federal and state law to his supervisor, is retaliated against by his employer. #EmploymentLaw #LaborCode #FEHA #DisabilityDiscrimination #EskridgeLaw

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started